Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4602 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 63% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-875K - 732 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
18.644688644688646%
Multi-Core
1761
10.227074743016436%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
