Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4602 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 49% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-875K - 672 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £142.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
22.227074235807862%
Multi-Core
1761
16.389018147975804%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |