Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2865 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-875K - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |