Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2286 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £208.88 vs £525.79
- Up to 59% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900F - £0.75 vs £1.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i7-8700K - 289 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 32 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
278
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17413 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.82/FPS
41%
Price, £
£525.79
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for £525.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |