Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 191 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - £24.62 vs £208.88
- Up to 86% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-8700K - £0.15 vs £1.09 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |