Buy on Amazon
£270.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 3514 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Core i7-860 - 59 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
44
74.57627118644068%
Value, £/FPS
£6.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270.91
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-860 - processors (Intel Core i7-xxx, Socket H (LGA 1156), i7-860, 64-bit, L3, 0.65 - 1.4 V)
Buy for £270.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
31.123517096999304%
Multi-Core
1463
24.407741074407742%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
