Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 3043 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 44% better in Starfield than Core i7-840QM - 62 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65813 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Single-Core
394
23.621103117505996%
Multi-Core
916
11.507537688442211%
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |