Buy on Amazon
£325
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $568
Availability
MSRP in USD: $568
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3602 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 68% better in F1 23 than Core i7-840QM - 240 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 20 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
