Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2794 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-840QM - 253 vs 232 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
