Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5220 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-820QM - 192 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£514.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |