Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4752 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-820QM - 583 vs 502 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 20 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
