Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4486 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 36% better in Minecraft than Core i7-820QM - 801 vs 591 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
801
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£114.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £114.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |