Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 217 days older than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-7820HQ - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1185
96.81372549019608%
Multi-Core
3555
62.79809220985692%
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
