Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700HQ is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700HQ
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 127 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-7700HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
