Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1316 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
