Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1555 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than FX-6200 - 55 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
