Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4852 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 39% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i7-640M - 172 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 32 vs 4 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
172
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£489.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |