Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2468 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-640M - 131 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 64 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
Arrandale | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |