Buy on Amazon
£89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 822 days newer than Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Core i5-3470 - 676 vs 618 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core I5-3470 Processor (3.20GHZ, 6MB Cache, Socket 1155)
Buy for £89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
53.62068965517241%
Multi-Core
1840
33.804887010839614%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
