Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i7-4930MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2633 days newer than Core i7-4930MX.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930MX
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 57 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i7-4930MX - 62 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930MX - 64 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2293.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,293.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930MX | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
57 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |