Buy on Amazon
£169.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $570
Availability
MSRP in USD: $570
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-4900MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than Core i7-4900MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 47 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4900MQ - 659 vs 514 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4900MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
659
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3.9 GHz / 4.9 GHz, 12M Cache)
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4900MQ
Mobile • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4900MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
