Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 2045 days newer than Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4820K - 161 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
