Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 370 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4130 - 156 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
