Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 882 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 47 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-4810MQ - 259 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |