Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 528 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 47 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-4810MQ - 294 vs 287 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £108.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Single-Core
1079
76.03946441155743%
Multi-Core
3184
79.36191425722832%
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |