Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4810MQ outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4810MQ is 413 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1620 - 126 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |