Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4810MQ outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4810MQ is 266 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 47 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |