Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2646 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 47 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Core i7-4800MQ - 744 vs 664 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 20 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
744
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |