Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 130 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 340 vs 334 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 12 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |