Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 463 days newer than Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4765T - 500 vs 498 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
498
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£93.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £93.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |