Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1788 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Core i7-4700MQ - 163 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |