Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-4700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2850 days newer than Core i7-4700HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 47 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Core i7-4700HQ - 214 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£125.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £125.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Single-Core
980
44.83074107959744%
Multi-Core
3051
35.563585499475465%
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |