Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3068 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 37 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4600M - 205 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |