Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2135 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 37 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-4600M - 216 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 24 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
