Buy on Amazon
£514.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4085 days newer than Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3970X - 223 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
223
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£514.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-14900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-3970X
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-3970X or Core i9-14900F
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme
100 FPS
£20.23/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i9-14900F
64 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£2,022.92
In Stock
223 FPS
£17.83/FPS
GeForce RTX 4090
Core i9-14900F
64 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£3,975.87
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
