Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1985 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-3820QM - 124 vs 117 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £178.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |