Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2348 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2200% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i7-3820QM - 23 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65945 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
629
49.37205651491366%
Multi-Core
2147
28.803327072712637%
Intel Core i7-3820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |