Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2991 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-3820QM - 218 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
629
36.37941006362059%
Multi-Core
2147
21.405782652043868%
Intel Core i7-3820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |