Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i7-3770T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1960 days newer than Core i7-3770T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770T
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-3770T - 247 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770T - 24 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3770T
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770T
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
605
44.354838709677416%
Multi-Core
1964
21.57767523621182%
Intel Core i7-3770T | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
