Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 4203 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3520M - 152 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i7-3520M - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-3520M
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3520M
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
568
22.940226171243943%
Multi-Core
1152
10.898770104068117%
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
