Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2967 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-2860QM - 592 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
592
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1034.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,034.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |