Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2554 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 10% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-2860QM - 86 vs 78 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
86
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £44.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
560
40.609137055837564%
Multi-Core
1670
46.427578537670286%
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |