Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1458 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than Core i7-2860QM - 167 vs 135 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |