Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2999 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-2860QM - 124 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
560
58.516196447230925%
Multi-Core
1670
84.55696202531645%
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
