Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2820QM outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2820QM is 659 days older than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8320 - 230 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2820QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
