Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Core i7-2760QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 2355 days newer than Core i7-2760QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2760QM
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 45 vs 62 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-2760QM - 292 vs 275 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
292
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2760QM | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 62 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |