Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4459 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £91.0 vs £514.33
- Up to 78% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900F - £0.81 vs £3.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2700K - 140 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.67/FPS
22%
Price, £
£514.33
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |