Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 4394 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 29% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-2635QM - 301 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
301
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£339.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £339.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |