Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4285 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 76% better in Rust than Core i7-2630QM - 269 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2630QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
269
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£495.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £495.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |