Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - 209 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - £237.34 vs £359.98
- Up to 29% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700F - £1.22 vs £1.72 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.72/FPS
70%
Price, £
£359.98
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for £359.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 663 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£237.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £237.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |